The Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights

RJ de Beer, S Vettori

Abstract


In recent years the South African legislature has made a very bold attempt to improve the socio-economic conditions of citizens. Amongst others, the Social Assistance Act 59 of 1992 provides for monthly payments to citizens under certain prescribed conditions. In situations where other legislation does not provide a remedy for those unable to care for themselves the Constitution provides for justiciable socio-economic rights. Unfortunately legislative rights alone have proved insufficient and all too frequently the constitutional values and aspirations of human dignity and equality have had a ‘hollow ring’. The most obvious reason for this failure of delivery on the part of the government is of course a shortage of financial resources.  Another reason has been a simple disregard for the terms of legislation and court orders by organs of the state and state employees.  The authors are of the view that in order to avoid such a dire result, the courts, given their broadly framed constitutional powers, should be adventurous in crafting means to ensure that their orders are properly implemented and adhered to. This article explores the role that courts can play in ensuring proper implementation of both the terms of social security legislation as well as the implementation of court orders with reference to well-fare judgments in the Eastern-Cape.

Full Text:

PDF XML

References


Bibliography

Davies 2006 22 SAJHR 301

Davies DM “Adjudicating the Socio-Economic Rights in the South African Constitution: Towards ‘Deference Lite’?” 2006 22 SAJHR 301

Neethling, Potgieter and Visser Law of Delict

Neethling J, Potgieter JM and Visser PJ Law of Delict 5th ed (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2006)

Pillay 2002 Economic and Social Rights Review 11

Pillay K “Implementing Grootboom: Supervision Needed” 2002 3 Economic and Social Rights Review 11

Swart 2005 SAJHR 215

Swart M “Left out in the Cold? Crafting Constitutional Remedies for the poorest of the Poor” 2005 SAJHR 215

Trengrove 1999 Economic and Social Rights Law Review 8-10

Trengrove W “Judicial Remedies for Violations of Socio Economic Rights” 1999 1 (4) Economic and Social Rights Law Review 8-10

Register of cases

City of Johannesburg v Rand Properties 2006 (6) Case No 253/06 (SCA)

East London Transitional Local Council v Member of the Executive Council of the Province of the Eastern Cape for Health and Others 2000 4 All SA 443 (CK)

EN and Others v The Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others Unreported Case No 4576/06 DCLD

EN and Others v Government of the Republic of South Africa 2007 (1) DCLR 84 (D)

Fose v Minister of Safety and Security 1997 3 SA 786 (CC) Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others 2000 11 BCLR 1169 (CC)

Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (CC)

Jayiya v Member of the Executive Council for Welfare, Eastern Cape and another 2004 (2) SA 611 (SCA)

Kate v The Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Welfare 2005 (1) SA 141 (SE)

Kiliko and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others 2006 (4) SA 114 (C)

MEC, Department of Welfare, Eastern Cape v Kate 2006 (4) SA 478 (SCA) Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others 2002 5

SA 721 (CC)

Mjeni v Minister of Health and Welfare, Eastern Cape 2000 4 SA 446 (Tk)

N and Others v Government of Republic of South Africa and Others (No 3) 2006 (6) SA 575 (D)

N and Others v Government of the Republic of South Africa (No 1) 2006 (6) SA

(D)

Ngxuza v Permanent Secretary, Department of Welfare, Eastern Cape

Provincial Government 2001 2 SA 609 (E)

Permanent Secretary, Department of Welfare, Eastern Cape Provincial

Government v Ngxuza 2001 4 SA 1184 (SCA)

President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Modderklip Boerdery Pty

Ltd (Agri SA and Agri SA and Legal Resources Centre, Amici Curiae) 2004 6 SA 40 (SCA)

Rail Commuters Action Group and Others v Transnet Ltd t/a Metrorail and

Others 2005 (2) SA 359 (CC)

S v Mfezeko Zuba and 23 similar Cases 2004 4 BCLR 410 (E)

Soobramoney v Minister of Health, Kwazulu Natal 1998 1 SA 765 (CC) Thozamile Eric Magidimisi NO v The Premier of the Eastern Cape, The MEC

For Finance Eastern Cape, The MEC for Social Development Eastern

Cape, The Head of the Department of Social Development Eastern Cape,

The Mister of Justice Case Number 2180/04 marked Reportable Vumazonke v MEC for Social Development Eastern, Cape and Three Similar Cases 2005 6 SA 229 (SE)

Register of legislation

Abolition of Civil Imprisonment Act 2 of 1997

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996

Immigration Act 13 of 2002

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000

Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004

State Liability Act 20 of 1957

Welfare Laws Amendment Act 106 of 1997

Register of internet sources

Broughton The Mercury http://www.iol.co.za/ 29 Dec

Broughton T “Annoyed judge questions social grant cases” The Mercury 30 July 2007 [Found on internet] http://www.iol.co.za/general/news/newsprint.php?art_id=vn20070730042554688C323016&sf= [Date of use 29 December 2007]




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2007/v10i3a2798

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 RJ de Beer, S Vettori

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.