Vertoon die Corpus Iuris Civilis Kenmerke van 'n Abstrakte Stelsel van Eiendomsoordrag?

PJW Schutte

Abstract


It is generally accepted that an abstract system for the transfer of property is applied in South Africa. Characteristic of an abstract system is that the different legal acts which form part of the process, namely the obligatory agreement, delivery of the thing concerned or registration and the real agreement are separated from each other. The real agreement is an agreement between the transferor and the transferee based on a meeting of the minds; it is directed at the transfer of ownership by delivery and should be distinguished from the underlying causa (for example an obligatory agreement). The real agreement merely consists of the transferor’s intention to transfer property and the transferee’s intention to receive property. A second characteristic of the real agreement is that it should meet its own requirements. It is therefore not dependent on the validity of the preceding obligation or any other legal act. This means that ownership will pass from the transferor to the transferee even though the underlying obligatory agreement is invalid. 

The real agreement is an invention of the German jurist Friedrich Carl von Savigny. The purpose with this article is to ascertain whether or not Roman law at the time of Justinian reflects any of the characteristics of an abstract system and the real agreement (which is generally associated with an abstract system). Can it be said that Savigny based his theory on Roman law? It appears from this paper that a clear distinction was drawn in Roman law between the causa (obligatory agreement) and delivery (traditio). Ownership in movable and immovable property did not

pass directly by virtue of the conclusion of the contract of sale or donation (causa) - the thing concerned had to be delivered to the transferee in a legally accepted way as well. Although there is no clarity regarding the question of whether or not a valid causa was a requirement for the transfer of ownership, it can be stated with a fair amount of certainty that the causa had to be valid in those cases where delivery was effected by virtue of sale and donation. If the causa was invalid, ownership did not pass, even though the parties had the intention to pass ownership. In this regard Roman law at the time of Justinian reflects the characteristics of a causal system. However, if the thing was delivered on account of a dos or solutio by virtue of a stipulatio (and maybe also mutuum), there was no prior obligatory agreement and traditio was not affected by the causa at all. Ownership had passed merely by virtue of the intention to transfer and to receive ownership. In other words, Roman law portrays characteristics of an abstract system in these situations. 

Regarding the question whether or not the reciprocal intention to transfer and to receive ownership had been construed as an independent agreement which should be distinguished from the obligatory agreement, it appears that that was not the case. Because of the dual nature of the contract of sale in Roman law (it created an obligation but it was also iusta causa traditionis), it was accepted that the intention to transfer and to receive ownership was actually contained in the obligatory agreement. It did not exist on its own as a separate agreement (except in cases of a dos, solutio and mutuum). However, it emerges that the intention was emphasised more and more and that it was gradually loosened from the causa. The loosening, however, existed merely in the vision that the intention to pass ownership (as contained in the causa) can continue to exist on its own even though the causa appears to be invalid. The bond between causa and traditio was not yet finally broken, because it was still the intention at the time of the obligatory agreement that effected the passing of ownership. The conclusion is that there was no sign of a real agreement which merely consisted of the reciprocal intention to transfer and receive ownership and which existed independently from the underlying obligatory agreement.


Keywords


Transfer of property; abstract system of transfer of property; causal system of transfer of property; real agreement; intention to transfer property; animus possidendi; possessio; iusta causa traditio; mancipatio; solutio; stipulatio; mutuum; Savigny; Rom

Full Text:

PDF XML

References


Bibliografie

Baus Kausale Verfügung

Baus G Kausale Verfügung und gutglaubiger Erwerb (F Vahlen Berlyn 1939)

Carey Miller Acquisition

Carey Miller DL The Acquisition and Protection of Ownership (Juta Kaapstad 1986)

Codex Iustinianus

Krüger P (red) Corpus Iuris Civilis Vol II 9e uitg (Weidmann Berlyn 1915)

Delport Lewering en Registrasie

Delport JT Lewering en Registrasie as Eiendomsoordragshandelinge in die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg (LL D-proefskrif Universiteit van Port Elizabeth 1976)

Digesta Iustiniani

Spruit JE, Feenstra R en Bongenaar KEM (reds) Corpus Iuris Civilis Vol II-VI (Walburg Pers Zutphen 1993-2001)

Dondorp en Schrage Levering

Dondorp JH en Schrage EJH Levering Krachtens Geldige Titel: Enige Grepen uit de Geschiedenis van de Vereisten Voor Eigendomsoverdracht (VU Uitgewers Amsterdam 1991)

Ehrhardt Iusta Causa

Ehrhardt A Iusta Causa Traditionis: Eine Untersuchung Über den Erwerb des Eigentums nach Römischem Recht (De Gruyter Berlyn 1930)

Feenstra (red) Grondslagen

Feenstra R (red) Romeinsrechtelijke Grondslagen van het Nederlands Privaatrecht 5e uitg (Brill Akademiese Uitgewers Leiden 1990)

Fuchs Iusta Causa

Fuchs JG Iusta Causa Traditionis in der Romanistischen Wissenschaft (Helbing & Lichtenhahn Basel 1952)

Gordon Traditio

Gordon WM Studies in the Transfer of Property by Traditio (Universiteit van Aberdeen Aberdeen 1970)

Hazewinkel-Zuringa D Mancipatio en Traditio Bijdrage tot de Kennis van de Eigendomsoverdracht in het Romeinsche Recht (Proefskrif Universiteit Amsterdam 1931)

Honsell, Mayer-Maly en Selb Römisches Recht

Honsell H, Mayer-Maly T en Selb W Römisches Recht 4e uitg (Springer Berlyn 1987)

Institutiones Iustiniani

Krüger P (red) Corpus Iuris Civilis Vol I 21e uitg (Weidmann Berlyn 1970)

Kaser Privatrecht

Kaser M Das Römische Privatrecht Band I & II 2e uitg (Beck München 1971-1975)

Kaser/Wubbe Romeins Privaatrecht

Kaser M Das Römische Privatrecht (Nederlandse vertaling van die oorspronklike Duits deur Wubbe FBJ Romeins Privaatrecht) 2e uitg (Tjeenk Willink Zwolle 1971)

Kop Vulgaire Recht

Kop PC Beschouwingen over het zogenaamde 'Vulgaire' Romeinse Recht (Leiden Zwolle 1980)

Lange Kausale Element

Lange H Das kausale Element im Tatbestand der klassischen Eigen-tumstradition (Weicher Leipzig 1930)

Levy Vulgar Law

Levy E West-Roman Vulgar Law: The law of Property (American Philosophical Association Philadelphia 1951)

Lokin Leerstukken

Lokin JHA Vermogensrechtelijke Leerstukken Aan de Hand van Romeinsrechtelijke Teksten (Rijksuniversiteit Gröningen 1991)

Lokin Overdracht 9-21

Lokin JHA “De overdracht van onroerend goed in het Romeinse recht” in Ars No-tariatus XXXII De levering van onroerend goed. Vijf opstellen over de over-dracht van onroerend goed vanaf het Romeinse recht tot het Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek (Kluwer Deventer 1985)

Middelberg Houderschap

Middelberg AWF Bescherming van het Houderschap (LL D-proefskrif Universiteit van Pretoria 1953)

Molkenteller Dinglichen Vertrag

Molkenteller DH Die These vom Dinglichen Vertrag: Zur Formalen Struktur der Eigentumsübertragung nach §929 Satz 1 BGB (Peter Lang Frankfurt 1991)

Novellae Iustiniani

Scholl L en Kroll W (reds) Corpus Iuris Civilis Vol III (Berlyn 1895)

Pringsheim 1933 LQR 43-60

Pringsheim F "Animus in Roman Law" 1933 The Law Quarterly Review 43-60

Van der Walt Houerskap

Van der Walt AJ Ontwikkeling van Houerskap (LL D-proefskrif Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelike Hoër Onderwys 1985)

Van Oven Bezitsbescherming

Van Oven JC De Bezitsbescherming en Hare Functies (Proefskrif Universiteit van Amsterdam 1905)

Van Oven JC Romeinsch Privaatrecht

Van Oven JC Leerboek van Romeinsch Privaatrecht 3e uitg (Brill Akademiese Uitgewers Leiden 1948)

Van Zyl DH Romeinse Privaatreg

Van Zyl DH Geskiedenis en Beginsels van die Romeinse Privaatreg 2e uitg (Butterworths Durban 1977)

Voß Recht und Rhetorik

Voß WE Recht und Rhetorik in den Kaisergesetzen der Spätantike (Loewenklau Gesellschaft Frankfurt 1982)

Weiss Institutionen

Weiss E Institutionen des Römischen Privatrechts 2e uitg (J Hess Stuttgart 1949)

Zimmermann Obligation

Zimmermann R The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Juta Kaapstad 1990)

Register van hofsake

Air-Kel (Edms) Bpk h/a Merkel Motors v Bodenstein en 'n ander 1980 3 SA 912 (A)

Bank Windhoek v Rajie 1994 1 SA 115 (A)

Cape Explosive Works Ltd and another v Denel (Pty) Ltd and others 2001 3 SA 569 (HHA) 577-578

Commissioner of Customs and Excise v Randles, Brothers and Hudson Ltd 1941 AD 369

Concor Construction (Cape) (Pty) Ltd v Santambank 1993 3 SA 930 (A)

Dryer NO and another v AXZS Industries (Pty) Ltd 2005 JOL 15566 (HHA) Krapohl v Oranje Koöperasie Bpk 1990 3 SA 848 (A)

Register van Internet bronne

Schutte 2000 PER 4-6 http://www.puk.ac.za/ 30 Mei

Schutte PJW “Oordrag van Eiendomsreg in die Vulgêre reg in die Wes-Romeinse ryk” 2000 (2) Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad [Beskikbaar op internet] http://www.puk.ac.za/fakulteite/regte/per/issue00v2.html [Datum van gebruik 30 Mei 2007]




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2007/v10i3a2801

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 PJW Schutte

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.