Oral Law in Litigation in South Africa: An Evidential Nightmare?

Christa Rautenbach

Abstract


In the past, customary law has been applied rather haphazardly in the courts. Its inherent adaptive flexibility and indeterminate nature created confusion in a court system ill-equipped to deal with litigation dealing with customary law issues. Understandably, customary law was treated in the same way as a common-law custom, which also originates in a community's acceptance of certain standards of behaviour. This meant that anyone averring a rule of customary law had to prove it, except where the rule was contained in a statute or precedent. The courts were not keen to engage in law-making and where the ascertainment of customary law proved to be difficult, they would merely apply the common law. In 1998, the Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988, which allows the judiciary to take judicial notice of readily accessible customary law, made fundamental changes to this situation. The Act is still in operation, although it must now be interpreted in the light of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (the Constitution). No direction on how this must be done can be found in the wording of the constitutional provisions dealing with the customary law. Besides instructing the courts to apply customary law when "applicable, subject to the Constitution and any legislation that specifically deals with customary law", the Constitution is silent on the way forward. Given the fact that most of the judiciary does not have any knowledge of the content of living customary law and the fact that there are fundamental differences between the evidentiary rules applied in the common and customary laws of South Africa, a few problems are bound to surface when litigating issues involving the customary law. They include: the status of customary law in the South African legal system; the applicability of customary law; and especially the determination of living customary law. The aim of this analysis is to determine if the existing evidentiary rules are appropriate to deal with these challenges in litigating matters involving customary law in the ordinary courts.

Full Text:

PDF XML

References


Literature

Bekker and Van der Merwe 2011 SAPL

Bekker JC and Van der Merwe IA "Proof and Ascertainment of Customary Law" 2011 SAPL 115-127

Bennett Application of Customary Law

Bennett TW The Application of Customary Law in Southern Africa (Juta Cape Town 1985)

Bennet Sourcebook of African Customary Law

Bennet TW A Sourcebook of African Customary Law for Southern Africa (Juta Cape Town 1991)

Elias Nature of African Customary Law

Elias TO The Nature of African Customary Law (Manchester University Press Manchester 1972)

Gorang 2015 JLPG

Gorang D "Ascertainment of Customary Law: A Question of Law or Fact or Both?" 2015 JLPG 93-95

Harris 1998 JCULR

Harris B "Indigenous Law in South Africa – Lessons for Australia?" 1998 JCULR 70-112

Kanyeihamba Commentaries on Law, Politics and Governance

Kanyeihamba GW Kanyeihamba's Commentaries on Law, Politics and Governance (LawAfrica Nairobi 2010)

Mmusinyane 2009 PER

Mmusinyane B "The Role of Traditional Authorities in Developing Customary Laws in Accordance with the Constitution: Shilubana and Others v Nwamitwa 2008 (9) BCLR (CC)" 2009 (12)3 PER 135-161

Onyango African Customary Law

Onyango P African Customary Law: An Introduction (LawAfrica Nairobi 2013)

Ozoemena 2015 PER

Ozoemena RN "Legislation as a Critical Tool in Addressing Social Change in South Africa: Lessons from Mayelane v Ngwenyama" 2015 (18)4 PER 969-992

Rautenbach 2003 Stell LR

Rautenbach C "Some Comments on the Status of Customary Law in Relation to the Bill of Rights" 2003 Stell LR 107-114

Rautenbach 2005 SAJHR

Rautenbach C "Therapeutic Jurisprudence in the Customary Courts of South Africa: Traditional Authority Courts as Therapeutic Agents" 2005 SAJHR 323-335

Rautenbach "Mixing South African Common and Customary Law of Intestate Succession"

Rautenbach C "Mixing South African Common and Customary Law of Intestate Succession: 'Potjiekos' in the Making" in Örücü E (ed) Mixed Legal Systems at New Frontiers (Wildy, Simmonds & Hill London 2010) 222-240

Rautenbach "Umkhosi Ukweshwama: Revival of a Zulu Festival"

Rautenbach C "Umkhosi Ukweshwama: Revival of a Zulu Festival in Celebration of the Universe's Rites of Passage" in Bennett TW (ed) Traditional African Religions (Juta Cape Town 2011) 63-89

Rautenbach "South Africa: Legal Recognition of Traditional Courts"

Rautenbach C "South Africa: Legal Recognition of Traditional Courts – Legal Pluralism in Action" in Kötter M et al (eds) Non-State Justice Institutions and the Law: Decision-Making at the Interface of Tradition, Religion and the State (Palgrave McMillan Basingstoke 2015) 121-151

Rautenbach and Bekker Introduction to Legal Pluralism

Rautenbach C and Bekker JC Introduction to Legal Pluralism in South Africa 4th ed (LexisNexis Durban 2014)

Rautenbach and Matthee 2010 J Legal Plur

Rautenbach C and Matthee JL "Common Law Crimes and Indigenous Customs: Dealing with the Issues in South African Law" 2010 J Legal Plur 109-144

SALC Report on the Harmonisation of the Common and the Indigenous Law

South African Law Commission Report on the Harmonisation of the Common and the Indigenous Law: Conflicts of Law (South African Law Commission Pretoria 1999)

Schapera Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom

Schapera I A Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom (LIT Verlag Münster-Hamburg 1994)

Schapera 1957 J Afr L

Schapera I "The Sources of Law in Tswana Tribal Courts: Legislation and Precedent" 1957 J Afr L 150-162

Schwikkard et al Principles of Evidence

Schwikkard PJ et al Principles of Evidence 3rd ed (Juta Claremont 2014)

Van Niekerk 2008 Fundamina

Van Niekerk GJ "Harmonisation of Indigenous Laws in Southern Africa" 2008 Fundamina 155-170

Zeffert and Paizes South African Law of Evidence

Zeffert DT and Paizes AP The South African Law of Evidence (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2003)

Case law

Alexkor Ltd v The Richtersveld Community 2004 5 SA 460 (CC)

Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha 2005 1 SA 580 (CC)

Breda v Jacobs 1921 AD 330

Ex parte Minister of Native Affairs: In re Yako v Beyi 1948 1 SA 388 (A)

Gumede v President of the Republic of South Africa 2009 3 SA 152 (CC)

Hlophe v Mahlalela 1998 1 SA 449 (T)

Jezile v S 2015 2 SACR 452 (WCC)

Mabena v Letsoalo 1998 2 SA 1068 (T)

Maisela v Kgolane 2000 2 SA 370 (T)

Masenya v Seleka Tribal Authority 1981 1 SA 522 (T)

MM v MN 2013 4 SA 415 (CC)

Mosii v Motseoakhumo 1954 3 SA 919 (A)

Ngcobo v Ngcobo 1929 AD 233

Pillay v Krishna 1946 AD 946

Shabalala v Attorney-General, Transvaal; Gumede v Attorney-General, Transvaal 1995 1 SA 608 (T)

Shilubana v Nwamitwa 2008 9 BCLR 914 (CC)

Sigcau v Sigcau 1944 AD 67

Smit v His Majesty King Goodwill Zwelithini Kabhekuzulu 2009 JDR 1361 (KZP)

Legislation

Black Administration Act 38 of 1927

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 200 of 1993

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Intestate Law of Succession Act 81 of 1987

KwaZulu Act on the Code of Zulu Law 16 of 1985

Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988

Magistrates' Courts Act 32 of 1944

Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998

Reform of Customary Law of Succession and Regulation of Related Matters Act 11 of 2009

Special Courts for Blacks Abolition Act 34 of 1986

Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003

Internet sources

English Oxford Living Dictionaries 2017 https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ascertain

English Oxford Living Dictionaries 2017 Ascertain https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ascertain accessed 7 April 2017




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a3268

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Christa Rautenbach

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.